Legal Opinion

Graham v. Township of St. Joseph

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1888PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Case made from Berrien. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit for taxes claimed to have been illegally assessed. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The plaintiff in this case is a resident of the township of St. Joseph, in the county of Berrien, and in 1886 was a stockholder in the Graham & Morton Transportation Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Illinois.

His stock was assessed in the township where he resided that year, and he paid the taxes levied against him under such assessment, protesting against the same, and he brings this suit to recover the taxes he thus paid.

The testimony was by stipulation, and in sulstance is as follows:

1. All the stock of the corporation is owned by Andrew Crawford, who resides…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Hays v. the Pacific Mail Steam-Ship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Morgan v. ParhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Commonwealth v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Bacon v. Board of State Tax CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Stroh v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. City of Augusta v. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API