Legal Opinion
United States v. Throckmorton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1996No. Nos. 95-50184, 95-50204PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Brace Hamilton Throckmorton and Mark Calicchio appeal their convictions for conspiracy to import a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963; importing a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) & 960(a)(1); possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.
Throckmorton contends the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to sever his trial from Calicchio’s.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine KhamisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.