Legal Opinion

Queen v. Jarrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1963No. 389PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The appeal of each defendant requires separate consideration.

MITCHELL’S APPEAL

Mitchell’s only assignment of error is directed to the court’s denial of his motions for judgment of nonsuit.

When plaintiff offered her evidence and rested, Mitchell moved for judgment of nonsuit; and, when the court refused his said motion, Mitchell excepted to the court’s ruling and announced that he did not choose to introduce evidence. G.S. 1-183. He contends he did not offer evidence or otherwise waive his exception to said ruling.

Unquestionably, testimony subsequently offered by Jarrett and by plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Landingham Ex Rel. Van Landingham v. Singer Sewing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Howell v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Dunlap v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Dreher v. . DivineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Nix v. EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. Secretary of the Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. King v. Premo & King, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Sass v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API