King v. Premo & King, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
APPEAL BY THE BANK OF MONTGOMERY
Parker, J.
The Bank of Montgomery assigns as error Judge Olive’s finding as a fact and as a matter of law “that the Receiver’s item of costs of administration and costs of conserving and sales of property, together with the Receiver’s fee, attorney’s fee, and accountant’s fee, were all necessary to the Receivership and the same are hereby in all respects approved and confirmed.”
The allowance of the costs of administration of a receivership of an insolvent 'corporation made by a court affects a substantial right of the creditors, in that it disposes of a part of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Richardson v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Odom v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Board of Com'rs of Sweetwater County, Wyo. v. BernardinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Bergeron v. SessionsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Bandy v. A Perfect Fit For You, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.