City of Atlanta v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
1. In order to allege a good cause of action as to ratification, it must be shown that the ratifying body, here the city council, had full knowledge of all material facts in connection with the transaction in question. Kephart v. Gulf Refining Co., 59 Ga. App. 432 (1 S. E. 2d, 221); Hale-Georgia Minerals Corp. v. Hale, 83 Ga. App. 561 (63 S. E. 2d, 920). There are no allegations that the City of Atlanta through its authorized agency ratified the contract with the knowledge of all its terms and that it was made by persons who purported to act as agents of the city. On power of municipal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Conyers v. Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Walker v. City of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Diamond Power Specialty Co. v. City of West PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Kephart v. Gulf Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- HALE-GEORGIA MINERALS CORPORATION v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sherman v. Atlanta Independent School SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013