Legal Opinion
Parate v. Isibor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1989No. 87-6100PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Natthu S. Parate (“Parate”), whose contract to teach at Tennessee State University (“TSU”) was not renewed, brought this civil rights action against defendants, various officials of TSU and the State University and Community College System of Tennessee. Parate complained that the defendants violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The district court dismissed Parate’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with prejudice; dismissed his pendent state law claims without prejudice; and granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. For the following…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Ronald Newsom Hasan Sharif Eddie J. McMillan and Donald Wolverton v. Steve Norris, Commissioner Michael Dutton, Warden and David HindmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Paul D. Gibbs v. Robert J. Hopkins Pat LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- John C. Bonnell and Nancy L. Bonnell v. Albert Lorenzo, William MacQueen and Gus J. Demas, Mark CousensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Everett Perry v. Kenneth McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Mertik v. BlalockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.