Legal Opinion
P & v Enterprises v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 19, 2006No. Civ.A. 1:05-cv-1579 (RBW)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
P & V Enterprises (“P & V”), Friendly Valley Equestrian Homes (“FVE”), SCC Acquisitions, Inc. (“SCC”), and SunCal Martinville LLC (“SunCal”) (collectively “the plaintiffs”) bring this action against the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE” or “the Corps”) and Lieutenant General Carl A. Strock, Commander and Chief of Engineers (collectively “the defendants”), challenging the facial validity of USACE regulation 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(a)(3) (2006) and seeking injunctive and declaratory relief under the federal question statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1331…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- P & v Enterprises v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Nader v. Democratic National CommitteeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Phillips v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.