Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1970No. M-716Published

1Opinion of the Court

November 3, 1970 Hon. John Allen, Chairman Opinion No. M-716 Texas Water Resources Study Committee Re: Does a waste water House of Representatives treatment plant quali- P. 0. Box 12236, Capitol Station' fy under the laws of Austin, Texas this state as a "pro- ject" eligible for loans and partial or complete participation of ownership by the state from the Water Dear Sir: Development Fund? By letter of r-cent date, your Committee has asked our opinion in answer to the following question: "Does a waste water treatment plant qualify under the laws of this state as a 'project' eligible for loans…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Corzelius v. HarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Clark v. Briscoe Irr. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Central Power & Light Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API