Legal Opinion

Newman v. Cover

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1930No. Appeal, 153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Moschziskee,

The five defendants in this case moved the court below to open a confessed judgment and let them in to a defense; this was done and the jury found in their favor. The use-plaintiff then moved for judgment n. o. v., which was refused. Final judgment was entered for defendants, and the use-plaintiff has appealed.

On June 9, 1926, the five defendants executed a demand note payable to C. J. Newman, for $12,000, and left it with Park O. Cover, one of the makers, for discount at the Peoples’ State Bank of Boswell, of which Newman, the payee on the note and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Volk v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Holthouse v. State ex rel. Ludlow Falls Quarry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Janes v. BensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Craighead v. McLoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loftus v. Miners Nat. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Cohen v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Godding v. SwansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Pennymac v. Neff, E. v. PNC BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API