Horridge v. Badman
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County
1Opinion of the Court
PlNOLA, P. J.,
Plaintiffs seek to set aside a deed to property sold to them by defendants because of fraudulent representations with reference to the extent of the property.
Statement of Pleadings and Issue Raised
The pleadings consist of a complaint and answer. The issue involved is whether the sale of the property by defendants to plaintiffs should be set aside and the consideration returned because of fraudulent representations by defendants as to the boundaries of the property.
From the evidence, we make the following
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiffs, John Horridge and Violet Horridge, are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Nathanson v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Shearer v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hoock v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Kienlen v. HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.