Legal Opinion

Doe v. Gleicher

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 2009No. 1-08-2724PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

In this appeal of a circuit court dismissal we tread warily through a procedural thicket. Plaintiffs Jane Doe and John Doe, individually and on behalf of their four minor children, appeal the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint, based on the doctrine of res judicata. Plaintiffs contend their claims were not barred by res judicata because requisite elements were not satisfied. We affirm.

FACTS

Jane and John underwent three in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments with defendant Doctor Norbert Gleicher at defendant fertility clinic, The Center for Human Reproduction (CHR). The first…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hudson v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Arvia v. MadiganIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dubina v. Mesirow Realty Development, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Land Trust Co. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Sales Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. City of Chicago v. St. John's United Church of ChristAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Meanith Huon v. Johnson & Bell, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Matejczyk v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Carlson v. The Rehabilitation Institute of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API