Legal Opinion
Culbreath v. Golding Enterprises, L.L.C.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 2007No. 2006-1302PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
*358{¶ 1} This appeal requires us to determine two issues. First, we decide whether the recipient of an unsolicited facsimile advertisement has a private cause of action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), Section 227(b), Title 47, U.S.Code for violations of Section 68.318(d), Title 47, C.F.R. Second, we address whether the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“OCSPA”), R.C. Chapter 1345, applies to the act of sending of an unsolicited facsimile advertisement received by a business entity.
{¶ 2} For the reasons that follow, we hold that Section 227(b), Title 47, U.S.Code does not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Heritage Hills, Ltd. v. DeaconOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Klein v. Vision Lab Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Compensation BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by14 opinions
- Charvat v. NMP, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Pruszynski v. ReevesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Semco, Inc. v. Sims Bros., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- United States v. Dish Network LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017
- Greer v. Finest Auto Wholesale, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.