Pruszynski v. Reeves
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} Today we decide an issue that has caused much consternation among the trial and appellate courts in this state. Does a motion for prejudgment interest pursuant to R.C. 1343.03(C) require the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing before rendering a ruling? For the reasons that follow, we hold that a trial court must set a date certain for an evidentiary hearing before ruling on an R.C. 1343.03(C) motion for prejudgment interest. Consequently, courts of appeals do not have the authority to rule on a motion for prejudgment interest when the trial court has ruled on the motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Rulli v. Fan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Hooten v. Safe Auto InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Miller v. First International Fidelity & Trust Building, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- Culbreath v. Golding Enterprises, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. PullinsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Willie M. Folks v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Nguyen v. ChenOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Clark v. Grant Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.