Legal Opinion

Twyman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 11, 1973No. 7 Div. 256PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Buying, receiving, etc., stolen personal property: sentence, three years in the penitentiary. Code 1940, T. 14, § 338.

A majority of the Court considering that the instant record fails to show compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, as applied in Honeycutt v. State, 47 Ala.App. 640, 259 So.2d 846 and Walcott v. State, 288 Ala. 546, 263 So.2d 178, the judgment below is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

ALMON, HARRIS and DeCARLO, JJ., concur. CATES, P. J., and TYSON, J., dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In RE WALCOTT v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Honeycuttt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Twyman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  3. Starks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Jarman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Browning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API