Legal Opinion
Ruth v. Fenchel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 11, 1955PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
37 N.J. Super. 295 (1955)
117 A.2d 284
JAMES R. RUTH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
IRVING FENCHEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 7, 1955.
Decided October 11, 1955.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Seymour Margulies argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Ezra L. Nolan, attorney; Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier, of counsel; Mr. Margulies, on the brief).
Mr. Eugene T. Sharkey argued the cause for respondents (Mr. John J. Wygant, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
On May 30, 1953 there was a collision…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jordan v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Commonwealth v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCay Ex Rel. McCay v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
- Jacober v. St. Peter's Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Band's Refuse Removal, Inc. v. Fair Lawn Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Tittle v. HurlbuttHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- Jones v. BloomMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.