Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Price v. Hinsdale-Doyle Granite Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1889No. 13,639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Berkshire, J. —

This is a suit upon a bond executed pursuant to section 4246, R. S. 1881.

The only error assigned is error of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial.

There are three reasons stated in the motion :

I. The decision of the court is contrary to law.

2. The decision of the court is not supported by sufficient evidence.

3. The decision of the court is contrary to the evidence.

The facts, as we find them in the record, are about these: On the 14th day of July, 1880, the appellees executed the bond sued upon to secure the performance of a contract thereafter on the 17th day of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Kline v. National Benefit Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. S. Luck & Sons, Inc. v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Swindle v. State ex rel. LeakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. School District No. 6 v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API