Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. Trammell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1951No. 15231PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULVER, Justice.

Appellant, Jack Whitlock and wife, brought this suit against appellee, J. W. Trammell, alleging that they had made a verbal bailment contract, by the terms of which, for a consideration, Trammell was to receive and use a large commercial trailer belonging to appellants, while the appellant Whitlock was making a trip to California, and that upon his return the truck was redelivered to him in a damaged condition. The appellee answered by a 'general denial.

Upon the trial, appellee maintained that he made no such agreement, 'that the trailer was never delivered to him and that he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Exporters' & Traders' Compress & Warehouse Co. v. SchulzeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Mustang Aviation, Inc. v. RidgwayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Thomas v. HackneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Carothers v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Nicholson Transit Co. v. Nicholson Universal S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trammell v. WhitlockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Allright, Inc. v. StrawderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Trammell v. WhitlockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Frankie P. Carter and TMC Auto Transport, Inc. v. Mike Flowers, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  5. Frankie P. Carter and TMC Auto Transport, Inc. v. Mike Flowers, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API