Legal Opinion
Lender v. London
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 27, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract. There are two counts in the declaration, one upon an account annexed in which two items were for installing heating systems in designated houses “as agreed,” the other for a balance due on a quantum meruit for materials furnished and work performed. The trial judge, after having filed a statement of findings and rulings not now before us, filed later a supplementary statement of findings. In brief, those findings were to the effect that the parties entered into two contracts in writing as to installing heating systems in certain houses, and that the plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Richards v. AppletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- In re KeohaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Barnard Manufacturing Co. v. Eugen C. Andres Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Vinal v. Inhabitants of NahantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Stowell v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- James B. Rendle Co. v. Conley & Daggett, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Calligaris's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Ryan v. VeraMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.