Legal Opinion

Ross v. Borough of Dormont

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-1389PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*642OPINION

KELLY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs, Phillip Ross (“Plaintiff’), the former Chief of Police of the Borough of Dormont, and his wife, Michelle Ross, brought this lawsuit against Defendants Borough of Dormont (“the Borough”), Gino Rizza (“Rizza”), individually and as Borough Manager, Kim Lusardi (“Lusardi”), Laurie Malka (“Malka”), Eugene Barilla (“Barilla”), Drew Lehman (“Lehman”), and Heather Schmidt (“Schmidt”) (collectively, “Defendants”),1 alleging that Defendants violated Plaintiffs civil rights relative to several Loudermill hearings to which Plaintiff was subjected…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D.C. v. PITTSBURGH PUBLIC SCHOOLSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API