Legal Opinion

State v. Bujan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2008No. 20060883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 We accepted this case to determine whether the court of appeals correctly construed the seope of rule 801(d)(1)(B) of the Utah Rules of Evidence and whether the court of appeals correctly applied the rule to pretrial statements admitted at the defendant's trial. We find that the court of appeals correctly applied the rule to this case, but clarify its construction of the seope of the rule. Rule 801(d)(1)(B) permits consistent, out-of-court statements to be admitted as nonhearsay if offered to rebut a charge of recent fabrication, improper influence, or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. State v. CaseyUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. SibertUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. MaresUtah Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. TrippUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Judson v. Wheeler RV Las Vegas, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. VallejoUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Reynolds v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API