Faulder v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentOnion, Presiding Judge
Courts are reluctant to decide constitutional questions and they should be passed on only when raised and when the necessity arises. 12 Tex.Jur.2d, Constitutional Law, § 14, p. 362. I am convinced there is no necessity to pass on the constitutional question here involved. A statute answers the question. Further, if the constitutional question is to be reached, I have concluded the majority opinion, which ignores the rules of constitutional construction and uses artificial and simplistic reasoning, is wrong, dead wrong. For these reasons, I dissent.
The relator Faulder was convicted of capital…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Durham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.