Legal Opinion

Continental 611 Fund LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, et al.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 15, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00594Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN CONTINENTAL 611 FUND LLC, Plaintiff, Case No. 25-cv-594-pp v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT BRIEFING (DKT. NO. 14), GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND (DKT. NO. 8), REMANDING CASE AND DECLINING TO RULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (DKT. NO. 5) On March 7, 2025, the plaintiff filed a complaint in Waukesha County Circuit Court, alleging breach of contract and requesting declaratory relief. Dkt. No. 1-1. The defendants removed the case to this…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Ge Energy Power Conversion Fr. Sas, Corp. v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. Hernandez v. Cook County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API