Legal Opinion
Vogt v. Chater
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 27, 1997No. 96-4060-SACPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, Senior District Judge.
This is an action to review the final decision of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying the plaintiff Martha P. Vogt’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The ease is ripe for decision on the parties briefs filed pursuant to D.Kan. Rule 83.7.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Martha Vogt first filed an application for disability benefits on December 28, 1990. The application was denied initially and was not pursued. The plaintiff filed another application on September 6, 1991.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Mary Hope CASIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Janice S. ESTOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Biri v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Birnell v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Ortiz v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Buck v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.