Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Best
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 19, 1990No. Civ. A. 3:89-1986-15PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Ronald W. Falkosky, Mary F. Falkosky, or Scott Fal-kosky (the Falkosky family) in connection with a personal injury action previously instituted in state court by Martha G. Best, individually, and on behalf of her minor son, Burrell G. Best. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202. Jurisdiction is premised upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). The matter is currently before the court upon cross-motions for summary judgment. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ. Proc.
The personal injury action…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. McManusTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Bankert Ex Rel. Habush v. Threshermen's Mutual Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitcheson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Ben Arnold-Sunbelt Beverage Company Of South Carolina, LpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Walpole v. Great American Ins. CompaniesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1994
- TC X, Inc. v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
- Artful Color, Inc. v. HaleDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.