Public Service Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Doyle
My disposition is to affirm the judgment of the district court, which judgment affirms the findings of the Commission. The only justified modification made by the majority is that which pertains to removal of lines in the Arvada area. In other respects the Commission’s findings are most impressive. The Commission went to great lengths in its efforts to solve a most perplexing problem. It conducted hearings extending over a period of a year and its findings show a scrupulous adherence to the law and a conscientious effort to achieve a practical and equitable disposition of the issues. In view…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Industrial Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Davis v. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Natural Gas Service Co. v. Serv-Yu Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.