Moore v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 56, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 1229, dismissing bill in equity for an injunction, in case of Joseph F. Moore v. City of Pittsburgh, a Municipal Corporation of Pennsylvania; Joseph G. Armstrong, Mayor; E. S. Morrow, Controller; John M. Goehring, G. A. Dillinger, W. Y. English, Robert Garland, John S. Herron, J. P. Kerr, Enoch Rauh, S. S. Woodburn, Charles H. Hetzel, Members of the Council of said city, and…
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 56, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 1229, dismissing bill in equity for an injunction, in case of Joseph F. Moore v. City of Pittsburgh, a Municipal Corporation of Pennsylvania; Joseph G. Armstrong, Mayor; E. S. Morrow, Controller; John M. Goehring, G. A. Dillinger, W. Y. English, Robert Garland, John S. Herron, J. P. Kerr, Enoch Rauh, S. S. Woodburn, Charles H. Hetzel, Members of the Council of said city, and H. M. Landis, Treasurer of said city. Bill in equity for an injunction. Swearingen, J., filed the following opinion: This…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The sole question raised on this appeal is the constitutionality of the Acts of May 6, 1915, P. L. 260 and 272. We find nothing in the objections to their constitutionality which would have justified the court below in declaring them to be legislation in contravention of the Constitution, and the decree is affirmed at appellant’s.costs, on the opinion of the learned chancellor dismissing his bill.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Kocsis v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 8 v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- State v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- State v. City of ClearwaterSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.