Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is before us by original petition for writ of mandamus to Judge Ferrill D. McRae. Petitioners Richard H. Moore and The Dixie Co., Inc., claim Judge McRae abused his discretion in granting a jury trial in the case of John W.Mobley and Forest B. Brooks v. Richard H. Moore and The DixieCompany, the petitioners.

The complaint in Mobley et al. v. Moore et al., filed June 9, 1976, alleges that in 1964 Moore leased a quick foods restaurant to Mobley and Brooks. A clause in the lease states that the lessor agrees not to open a similar place of business within 2 miles of the restaurant during…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Amf Tuboscope, Inc., and American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Joe H. Cunningham and Arrow Pipe Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  5. Poston v. GaddisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Dorcal, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Ex Parte MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ex Parte Twintech Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Ex Parte MarcrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API