Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1977No. 38670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the trial court’s action denying, without evidentiary hearing, his second motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 27.26 V.A.M.R. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of murder in the first degree in October, 1970 and sentenced to life imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Haynes, 482 S.W.2d 444 (Mo.1972).

In December, 1973, movant filed his first motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 27.26. Counsel for movant was appointed, and after an evidentiary hearing, the motion was denied.

On the appeal of the first motion, movant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sweazea v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. Haynes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. HaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Duncan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Ivy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frost v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Drake v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Mitchell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Morris v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API