Legal Opinion

Samsun Logix Corp. v. Bank of China

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 9, 2010No. 10 Civ. 4203 (VM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

This motion for remand requires the Court to first consider a rarely-used removal statute found in the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the “Convention”), 9 U.S.C. § 205 (“§ 205”), and then a theory of removal, apparently making its debut here, that premises federal jurisdiction on reading the Edge Act’s removal provision, 12 U.S.C. § 632 (“§ 632”), with § 4(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978 (“IBA”), 12 U.S.C. § 3102(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court holds that neither…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Petra International Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. Beiser v. WeylerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goel v. RAMACHANDRANDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Cathay Capital Holdings II, LP v. ZhengDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  4. Chenco Engineering & Consulting GMBH v. Do-Fluoride New Materials Co. LTDDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025
  5. Schorr v. American Arbitration AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API