Wilson v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
The appellant, Arthur Wilson, and Era Mae Mathis were jointly accused of living in adultery. They were tried separately, and this appeal follows the conviction of the former.
The prosecution had its inception in the' county court where the appellant was charged by the name of Authur Wilson. This appeared without change in the original complaint filed in the circuit court. Over objection of the appellant the trial judge permitted the solicitor to amend the original complaint by changing the name from Authur to Arthur.
On appeal to the circuit court the solicitor is required by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- McKee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Lovejoy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. LileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Mosley v. City of AuburnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Sisson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Chastain v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.