Legal Opinion

State v. Glascock

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2007No. 26,337PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} Defendant appeals his convictions for four counts of forgery and one count of conspiracy to commit forgery, arising from several checks taken from his employer and signed in the employer’s name. All of Defendant’s convictions were based on making false signatures. See NMSA 1978, § 30-16-10(A) (1963). On appeal, Defendant argues that his forgery convictions violate double jeopardy. He asserts that, under a multiple punishment unit of prosecution theory, the New Mexico Legislature did not intend a separate conviction for each forged check. He also contends that, under…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BernalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. ManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. DeGraffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SwickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. ColemanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. SwickNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. GlascockNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API