Legal Opinion

In re Ridenour

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1973No. Crim. No. 23020Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

Petitioner Ridenour, by way of habeas corpus filed with the Supreme Court and transferred to this court, seeks to recall a remittitur *794issued by the appellate department of the superior court, dismissing his appeal from a judgment of conviction in the municipal court, asserting in his petition violation of state policy to hear appeals (In re Parker (1968) 68 Cal.2d 756, 760 [69 Cal.Rptr. 65, 441 P.2d 905]), deprivation of appeal in violation of Penal Code, section 1466, subdivision 1 (a), and deprivation of effective counsel on appeal, in violation of the Sixth Amendment of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. RhodenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. BynumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API