Legal Opinion

Libbey v. Van Bruggen

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1924No. 2731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PARKER, C. J.

Appellee, hereinafter called plaintiff brought action against appellant, hereinafter styled defendant, to enjoin him from having and maintaining a ditch over plaintiff’s land, wherewith defendant irrigated his adjoining lands. The court awarded a permanent injunction from which judgment defendant has appealed.

It appears that in the spring of 1916 defendant applied to plaintiff for leave to construct an irrigating ditch across plaintiff’s lands, which leave was verbally granted, without consideration to plaintiff, and upon condition that the ditch should be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. . NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Mendelson v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Pinkum v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hicks v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Rhoades v. McNamaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Price v. RowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. Conway v. San Miguel County Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API