Legal Opinion
Granger v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 25, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 86-7562PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
In this action, the plaintiff has filed a motion to compel the production of the *508defendant Amtrak’s Investigation Committee Report (“report”) which was prepared in connection with the plaintiff’s on-the-job accident. Amtrak opposes the motion to compel and asserts that portions of the report are not discoverable. For the reasons that follow, the plaintiff’s motion to compel will be granted in part and denied in part.
The plaintiff was involved in an accident on January 30, 1986, and allegedly sustained personal injuries, while employed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970
- Federal Trade Commission v. Trw, Inc. And Its Unincorporated Division, Trw Credit DataCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Robinson v. MagovernDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- Hardy v. New York News Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Kevin T. Dowling v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Wells Dairy, Inc. v. American Industrial Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1994
- Carlson v. Freightliner LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.