Legal Opinion
313 Freemason v. Freemason Assocs., Inc.
Virginia Circuit Court
Decided August 30, 2002No. Case Nos. (Law) CL 00-1339, CL 01-1341, CL 01-1342, CL 01-1343, CL 01-1344PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge John C. Morrison, Jr.
This issue comes before the Court on Defendants Freemason Associates, Inc., Conley Hall, and Thomas Dana’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court overrules the motion in part and sustains the motion in part.
hi Virginia, a trial court may enter summary judgment only if no material fact is genuinely in dispute. Sup. Ct. Rules, Rule 3:18. In considering a Motion for Summary Judgment, a trial court must adopt those inferences from the facts that are most favorable to the nonmoving party, unless the inferences are forced,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Kamlar Corp. v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- Lloyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
- Rorer Iron Co. v. TroutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Millisor v. Anchor Point Ventures, L.L.C.Hopewell County Circuit Court · 2008
- Watson v. LedermanNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2011
- 313 Freemason v. Freemason Assocs., Inc.Virginia Circuit Court · 2002
- Steffan v. Freemason Assocs., Inc.Virginia Circuit Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.