Hatfield Township v. Lexon Insurance Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Township has satisfied the strict requirements for mandatory preliminary injunctive relief. Simply, the trial court’s preliminary injunction to Lexon to pay $521,538.86 under a construction bond is an award of contract damages, which cannot be obtained in an equitable proceeding. A fortiori, a preliminary injunction to pay a discrete sum of money does not preserve the status quo but, rather, disturbs it. Accordingly, I would dissolve the trial court’s mandatory preliminary injunction.
T…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mazzie v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Willing v. MazzoconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SwiftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Purdy v. MasseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.