Legal Opinion

R. N. McCulloh & Co. v. Restivo

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Offutt, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court.

Angulo Restivo, a workman, employed by R. E. MeCullob & Company, was, on October 7th, 1922, injured in tbe course-of tbat employment, and applied for and was awarded compensation at tbe rate of eighteen dollars a week, by tbe Maryland Industrial Accident Commission, which was paid by the-Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, Limited, tbe in-, surer, until March, 1921. Tbe injury was to bis right “shoulder joint,” and as a result of it be was only able to-make partial use of bis right arm, and was, be said, unable to-' “follow bis work as a stone…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Jewel Tea Co. v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  2. United Railways & Electric Co. v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  3. Stewart & Co. v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  4. Schiller v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hendler Creamery Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. MayoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  3. Dembeck v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  4. Miller v. James McGraw Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. Trojan Boat Co. v. BoltonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API