Legal Opinion
Ibrahim v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 9, 2012No. 09-cv-1909 (ENV)(VVP)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
ERIC N. VITALIANO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Amr Ibrahim brings this action, pro se, against the United States and several agency and individual defendants (including an unknown’ number of “John Does”), He seeks to recover $73,453 for damage allegedly done to his furniture in the course of a customs inspection that took place in Detroit, Michigan. Ibrahim claims entitlement to relief under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680, as well as pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Defendants…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Al-Barr v. GarrettDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025
- Coleman v. YatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2023
- Hafen v. US Custom & Border ProtectionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Littlejohn v. Consolidated Edison Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Mays v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.