Legal Opinion

Cranor v. School District No. 2

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Gentry Circuit Court, Hon. John C. Howell, J. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. The court refused to look beyond the record proper, there being no proper bill of exceptions preserved at the trial.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Gentry Circuit Court, Hon. John C. Howell, J. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. The court refused to look beyond the record proper, there being no proper bill of exceptions preserved at the trial. I. The court erred in rejecting the evidence offered by defendant in support of defence set up in answer; and also in instructing that under the pleadings the plaintiff must recover; and also in overruling motion for new trial, and in arrest of judgment. The relation between a school district and teacher is that of employer and employe; and the district, by its…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Philips, P. J.

The appellant (defendant below) seeks a reversal of the judgment of the circuit court on the ground of alleged error in excluding certain evidence offered by defendant on the trial of this case. As this alleged error occurred in the progress of the trial, the only way the matter can be brought to the attention of this court for review is by a bill of exceptions, in which such occurrences must be preserved.

*400The record' shows that this case was tried at the September term, 1881, of the court} before the Hon. John H. Shahklin, as special judge. The motion for new trial was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Consaul v. LidellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stirling v. WagnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Fenn v. ReberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Sahlein v. GumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API