Legal Opinion

Sahlein v. Gum

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Howell Circuit Court. — Hon. Joseph. Cravens, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

This is a controversy between attaching creditors, and interpleaders, touching the validity of the sale of certain goods, made by the attachment debtors to the interpleaders. The cause was tried by the lower court without a jury, and resülted in a judgment in favor of the interpleaders. The plaintiffs, appealing, assign for error that the court excluded legal evidence offered by them, and refused proper declarations of law which they asked.

The first point to be decided is, whether there is any record evidence before us of either fact constituting the grounds of complaint, as the respondents…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woolfolk v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  2. Cocker v. CockerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Voullaire v. VoullaireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Smith v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Cranor v. School District No. 2Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stirling v. WagnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Fenn v. ReberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API