Legal Opinion
Center for Biological Diversity v. Salazar
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 28, 2011No. CV 07-484-TUC-AWTPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
A. WALLACE TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), the United States Army and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) carried out formal consultation to address the impacts of the Army’s proposed ongoing and future operations at Fort Huachuea from 2006-2016 on certain threatened and endangered species in the upper San Pedro River area of southeastern Arizona. Completing the consultation process, FWS issued a Biological Opinion (“BiOp”) on June 14, 2007 concluding, inter alia, that the Army’s operations would not jeopardize the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. David BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Oceana, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- National Audubon Society, Inc. v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Center for Biological Diversity v. BrantonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.