Svege v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corporation
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
KRAVITZ, District Judge.
In this motor vehicle accident case involving a death of a parent and bodily and emotional injuries to his children, who were orphaned as a result of the accident, Defendants move pursuant to Rules 42(b) and 16(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for separate trials before a single jury on the issues of liability and damages. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion For Bifurcation [doc. # 144].
The decision to bifurcate a trial into phases is a matter that lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. Fed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Dallas v. GoldbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Miller v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Witherbee v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moody v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- John Doe No. 1 v. Knights of ColumbusDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Daniels ex rel. Y.A. v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- Byrne v. Yale University, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Caraballo v. Home Depot USA IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.