Legal Opinion
Daniels ex rel. Y.A. v. City of Sioux City
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided September 13, 2013No. C13-4068-MWBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant the City of Sioux City (the City) has filed a motion (Doc. No. 13) to bifurcate claims and to stay discovery and trial. Plaintiffs have filed a resistance (Doc. No. 17) and the City has filed a reply (Doc. No. 19). I find that oral argument is not necessary. See Local Rule 7(c). The matter is fully submitted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs DaCosta Daniels, individually, and DaCosta Daniels, as mother, guardian and next friend of Y.A., a minor (collective, Daniels), filed this action on July 29, 2013. The complaint (Doc. No. 2) describes…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Response of Carolina, Inc. v. Leasco Response, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Quintanilla v. City of DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of Jeffrey Melvin v. City of Colorado Springs, ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- G-Met LLC v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017
- Harrison v. FaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2019
- Kraft Foods Global, Inc. v. United Egg Producers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Specialized Technological Threading, Inc. v. Murex Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2025