Legal Opinion

Reiser v. Plath

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 2, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Action by Jacob Reiser against Ernest E. Plath, as administrator of Charles A. Plath, deceased. Defendant appeals from an order referring the action to a referee to hear and determine the same.

1Per curiam

The appeal is from an order of compulsory reference. The complaint exhibits four several and separate causes of action, namely, two upon promissory notes, one upon an account stated, and one for money lent. The answer is, in legal effect, a general denial, and a plea of payment. We are of opinion that the court had no power to order a reference for determination of the issue, but that the parties were entitled to a trial of them by a jury. Clearly so as to the promissory notes, and the claim for money lent; and, as to the account stated, the issue involves no accounting, but only whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Camp v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Magown v. SinclairNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
  3. Streat v. RothschildNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Ohio Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API