Legal Opinion

Bridwell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 19, 1988No. 05-87-00197-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINKEADE, Justice.

Phillip E. Bridwell appeals from his two jury convictions for violating the Texas Securities Act and from the two twenty-year jury sentences which run cumulatively. In ten points of error, Bridwell claims: (1) the evidence is insufficient because there is no evidence that Bridwell’s charged actions constitute fraud under the Securities Act; (2) the indictment fails to state an offense because the facts which Bridwell allegedly failed to disclose do not constitute fraud upon the complainants in this case; (3) Bridwell was not required to reveal the information concerning his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Connor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Everett Craig Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2020
  4. Jack A. Gant, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1991
  5. Paul Edward Hicks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API