Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. Gray
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kavanagh, J.
On this record, it cannot be said that plaintiff has established as a matter of law that the 56 days it took it to issue its disclaimer was reasonable. Factual issues abound as to what plaintiff knew about the claim and when it learned it, barring entry of such a judgment.
While much is in dispute, what has been established is that on April 13, 2004, respondent Cathy Gray obtained, through an independent broker, a general commercial liability policy from *3plaintiff Lloyds of London to insure a vacant brownstone she owned and was about to have renovated. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- First Financial Insurance v. Jetco Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Deso v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Power Authority v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Great American E & S Insurance v. End Zone Pub & Grill of Narragansett, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
- GPH Partners, LLC v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- City of New York v. Welsbach Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- GPH Partners v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Battisti v. Broome Coop. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.