Legal Opinion

State v. Van Buren

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 5, 2004No. 30237-3-IIPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, C.J.

Albert Earl Van Burén appeals his exceptional sentence imposed after he entered an Alford1 plea to two counts of third degree rape of a child, RCW 9A.44.079, a class C felony, and one count of third degree rape, RCW 9A.44.060, also a class C felony. Although he stipulated to its correctness below, for the first time on appeal Van Burén objects to the sentencing court’s calculation of his offender score. He also challenges the trial court’s finding that he lacked remorse for his crimes and his exceptional sentence.

In our initial opinion, we held that the miscalculation of Van Buren’s offender…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API