Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Pitney

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 9, 1924No. 3119, 3120Published

1Opinion of the Court

2 F.2d 230 (1924)

DUFFY, Former Collector of Internal Revenue,

v.

PITNEY et al.[*]

FERGUSON, Collector of Internal Revenue,

v.

SAME.

Nos. 3119, 3120.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

October 9, 1924.

Walter G. Winne, U. S. Atty., of Hackensack, N. J., Walter H. Bacon, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., of Bridgeton, N. J., and Nelson T. Hartson, Sol. of Internal Revenue, and Thomas H. Lewis, Sp. Atty. Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs in error.

Pitney, Hardin & Skinner, of Newark, N. J. (Corwin Howell, of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for defendants in error.

Murray,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClainSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Rensselaer & S. R. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API