Legal Opinion

United States v. Burns

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2004No. 03-5532PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Collin Ladell Burns appeals the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon his plea of guilty to conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. *83§ 846. The parties have expressly waived oral argument, and upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

The presentence investigation report prepared in contemplation of sentencing called for a sentencing enhancement under USSG § 2Dl.l(b)(5)(C) because Burns “cooked” or manufactured the methamphetamine in a small mobile home where two young children were sleeping, and thus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. Francis A. KoeberleinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Marie Antoinette Jackson-RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Cheryl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Ronald Alan EnnengaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Oghenevwakpo IgbobaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API