Legal Opinion
Sun Co. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs and intervenor are the owners of various properties in the Oil City area of Syracuse. Defendant City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (SIDA) is pursuing a development plan for the area and has entered into a contract for that purpose with defendant Pyramid Companies. In January 1993, SIDA notified plaintiffs and intervenor that it intended to enter the properties for the purpose of making visual inspections. Plaintiffs sought an injunction barring such entry and a judgment declaring that SIDA was not a lawful…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Acquisition of Real Property by Broome CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Northville Dock Pipe Line Corp. v. FanningNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Power Authority v. PotocnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Sun Co. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- St. Johnsville v. TriumphoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Town of Haverstraw v. BarrerasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005